Turbines taller than Empire State Building

Source: By Rob Nikolewski, San Diego Union Tribune • Posted: Sunday, March 20, 2016

Wind turbines at the Ocotillo facility in Imperial County. Researchers are designing a test model to increase the size of wind blades to 200 meters, almost four times longer than the blades at Ocotillo.
Wind turbines at the Ocotillo facility in Imperial County. Researchers are designing a test model to increase the size of wind blades to 200 meters, almost four times longer than the blades at Ocotillo. — Peggy Peattie

In efforts to increase wind power, the blades on turbines designed by engineers, scientists and researchers keep getting bigger and bigger.

But a new design in the works takes the idea to levels most people can barely imagine: Blades up to 200 meters, or 656 feet, long — more than two football fields.

Today’s longest blades run 262 feet. The blades at the Ocotillo wind farm on Interstate 8 that sends electricity to San Diego are almost 174 feet long.


“We call it the extreme scale,” Eric Loth, a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at the University of Virginia, told the Union-Tribune. “There’s nothing like it.”

Loth is one of the leaders of a team that includes four universities and two national laboratories that has three years to build and test a scaled prototype in the hopes of making the über-blade concept a reality.

The early design would place two — rather than three — blades onto a tower. But to construct something of that size, the tower is estimated to rise 1,574 feet, nearly one-third of a mile.

To put that in perspective, that’s more than 100 feet higher than the Empire State Building.

The diameter of such a facility would be at least 1,312 feet wide, nearly one-quarter mile.

“It’s going to be incredible,” Loth said. “It’s mind-blowing, what we’re proposing in many respects, but I do think it’s possible.”

The super-sized blades would create enough power to generate up to 50 megawatts of electricity, 25 times more than today’s typical turbine.

“Two blades mean lower costs,” said Lucy Pao, team member and professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Colorado. “There are balance issues to consider.”

The U.S. Department of Energy is funding the project through its Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy program at a cost of $3.5 million.

By government standards, that doesn’t seem like much money.

“It’s enough to get us going,” Loth said. “It’s a perfect-sized grant for us to take it to the next level.”

The DOE program encourages researchers to pursue high risk-high reward projects, looking for breakthroughs in low-cost energy that reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

“The concepts have all looked very promising but they’re all pure simulations,” Loth said. “Now we’re actually going to build something. That’s where the rubber meets the road.”

Or where the blade meets the breeze.

The design is still in its infancy but the project’s goal is produce a prototype at one-tenth scale by 2019 that would be tested by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Colorado.

The blades would have a much different look than what is seen on today’s wind turbines.

First, they would not face the wind but would go downwind, aligning the blades to flow with the wind instead of fighting it.

“Downwind versus upwind captures the same amount of energy,” Loth said.

Second, instead of a single stiff blade, each blade would be broken into segments, allowing it to be more easily fabricated.

In addition, the concept would allow the blades to “morph” — spread out when the wind is blowing lightly to capture as much power as possible.

“Like a flower, the petals are spread out and we reach out and grab as much wind as we can,” Loth said.

Conversely, when winds blow with hurricane force the blades would contract, almost like a claw.

“Instead of just standing there, taking our piece of punishment from the wind, we kind of fold away,” Loth said.

The segmented blades offer another advantage.

Today’s single-framed blades are so big they are difficult for trucks to haul them on highways and difficult to make turns on streets.

But if the design works, the super-sized blades will be broken down in 40-meter or 50-meter segments and assembled at the site.

For all the excitement, though, there are concerns.

Bird lovers have long criticized the number of birds and bats killed by wind turbines and the proposition of humongous facilities makes conservation groups nervous.

“The higher you go, you start potentially impacting more migratory birds that otherwise would have otherwise flown over the tops of (smaller) turbines,” said Michael Parr, vice president and chief conservation officer for the American Bird Conservancy.

“It would depend a lot on where they put them,” said Garry George, renewable energy director, Audubon California. “It’s all location, location, location.”

Researchers acknowledge the anxiety over how 656-feet blades — officially called Segmented Ultralight Morphing Rotors, or SUMR — would affect the environment.

If the technology works, Loth wants to avoid putting the big blade facilities on land. Instead they would be put offshore — way offshore, some 20 to 25 miles from the coast.

“I really want to focus on going far enough offshore that we’re away from the migratory patterns of the birds,” Loth said.

But Parr said, “The problem with offshore turbines is that it’s virtually impossible to know and track over time what impact they’re having (on bird deaths) because any birds that get struck will fall directly into the ocean and be washed away by the currents or get eaten by sharks.”

“I want to see some science around it,” George said. “They’d have to do at least a year’s worth of study, maybe two.”

While some European countries such as Denmark have jumped into the offshore wind market, the United States has lagged behind.

The U.S. has no permanent offshore wind facilities but projects in Rhode Island and New Jersey are under construction.

California has not built any offshore wind facilities, although the development firm Trident Winds wants to put 100 floating wind turbines 15 miles off the coast of Morro Bay. The project is wending its way through the regulatory process.

If the SUMR project becomes a reality, it could go a long way toward helping California meet its ambitious renewable energy goals.

Last October Gov. Jerry Brown signed a climate change bill that requires the state to generate half of its electricity from renewable sources like wind and solar by 2030.

“California is always leading among states in terms of renewable energy,” Loth said. “If we can achieve our goals, California could actually be a great place to have offshore power.”

Nationally, wind accounts for 4.4 percent of the country’s electricity generation, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. California performs better, with wind making up 8.1 percent of the state’s power mix in 2014.

Last year U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz called for efforts to “fully unlock wind power as a critical national resource” and get wind energy supplying 20 percent of the nation’s electricity demand by 2030.

Even if the SUMR’s titanic turbines pass the subscale modeling tests in 2019, Loth said it would take “probably 10, 15 years” before the first facility would be up and running.

“We have to be really careful to prove our technology and our concept before someone’s going to sink in a lot of money,” Loth said.

“I’ll believe it when I see it,” said Robert Bryce, energy journalist and a vocal critic of wind energy. “While longer blades may allow project developers to produce more energy from their turbines, they will also require bigger towers to support them. That means higher costs.”

But besides generating more electricity, the SUMR project’s primary goal, team leaders say, is reducing the cost of wind energy by 50 percent.

“That is the big issue because right now wind energy is more expensive than fossil fuel energy. That’s just the way it is,” Loth said. “It’s wonderful to have no carbon or CO2 emissions but you have to do that cost effectively and that’s what this whole project is about.”