Colorado could save $2.5B through 2040 by replacing coal with clean energy: report

Source: By Robert Walton, Utility Dive • Posted: Monday, January 14, 2019

Colorado has strong wind and solar potential, and more studies, including an analysis released last month from Pacificorp, are finding coal plants are less economic than alternative fuel options. The Vibrant report comes a month after Xcel Energy, the state’s largest power provider, announced it would eliminate carbon emissions entirely by 2050.

The analysis concludes its proposed mix of cleaner resources would save Colorado electric customers roughly $2.5 billion in net present value through 2040.

If the state takes the lead on decarbonization in the power sector, it would lower customer bills by an average of 5%, Eric Blank, founder and strategic lead at Community Energy, said in a statement. And the report found an opportunity for coal plant owners to recover some sunk costs — up to $1.5 billion in undepreciated asset value if they facilitate a voluntary phased retirement of their facilities.

“The key to unlocking these benefits is to create a legal framework that enables utilities to voluntarily retire the coal plants,” Blank said. “Otherwise, it could take years to negotiate or litigate utility cost recovery, replacement power costs and impact on local communities.”

The economics trend extends beyond Colorado’s heavy renewable energy potential. In October, Northern Indiana Public Service Co. presented an analysis for its 2018 Integrated Resource Plan showing customers could save more than $4 billion over 30 years by moving from 65% coal to 15% coal in 2023 — and eliminating the resource by 2028.

In December, PacifiCorp revealed that 13 of its 22 coal units are more expensive than other fuels, including clean energy options. The utility, which operates coal plants in Colorado, has said more analysis is needed before it can make a decision on how to approach its coal fleet.